Love is not a word we hear much in the corporate world – at
least not in a positive context. Sure we hear about love triangles and the dark
side of corporate life but we shy away from that word in the context of how we
might treat others we work with and for.
What we don’t shy away from includes themes of covert competition as
embodied by passive aggression and Machiavellian political maneuvers. The
problem with not explicitly engendering a culture that values positive regard
and mutual respect for others is that, aside from the morale implications, covert
competition encourages behaviors in the workforce that come at a high
cost.
In their book Love em,or Lose em: Getting good people to stay, authors Beverly Kaye and Sharon Jordan-Evans point out that people don’t
leave companies, they leave people.
Additionally there are many, many surveys that show that people don’t
rate pay as the number one most important reason to stay in a job, they rate
relationships with the boss and the coworkers along with the satisfaction they
get from the work itself –which in today’s knowledge economy is impacted by the
boss and the co-workers. Additionally,
the cost of attrition is high. Kaye and Jordan-Evans measured it at 200% of the
employee’s salary. Knowledge that is
very hard to quantify walks out the door every time an employee leaves. The
cost of hiring employees is also high – in the tens of thousands for highly
skilled employees and in the thousands for less skilled. This all adds up
quickly. Also hard to calculate is the disruption and following loss of
productivity within the company every time an employee leaves, especially if
they leave because they are unhappy.
Organizational systems are interconnected self-aware webs. Leaders often underestimate the impact on for
example a whole department when there is even one bad employee/boss relationship
that results in an employee quitting. They then underestimate the communication
that has to accompany such events and in that underestimation don’t manage the
inevitable rumor mill leading to loss of focus and productivity and more
attrition.
Alternatively employees don’t realize that their attempts to
undermine the system are highly visible to those around them. An example of
this is the person who does the least amount of work on a team (social loafing)
or does not do the things they agree to do.
Humans are highly sensitive to these discrepancies – especially when
there are gaps between say and do.
The leader who says, everyone must attend this training because it’s
really important and then in the same breath says, he and his executive team
did a truncated version of the same training - is creating such a gap. The real message being – this is a check the
box activity for those lower in the hierarchy and not to be taken seriously. These
types of mixed messages deserve their own post, but you get the idea.
Because these behaviors go on they authorize other behaviors
including internal covert competition that is damaging. Above board competition that is transparent
and bound by rules can reap many benefits and renew a company. But when competition is covert it includes
nasty behaviors that kill teamwork and create awful work cultures where high
performance is not sustainable. Examples
of unhealthy competition are when one employee takes credit for another’s work
or when a leader attributes great work to the wrong employee because of a
personal connection or a hidden agenda.
Well poisoning is another
common covert competition tool and happens when one employee says things to
other employees or the boss that are negative about another employee – this is
a career killer for the one with the well poisoned if they are in a culture
that supports covert competition or it can be a career killer for the
instigator in a culture that values positive regard.
The best response by a leader to an employee who came into
her office once complaining about another employee was from Suzanne De Passe. She
ran a production company that put out popular shows like Sister, Sister and was Berry Gordy’s right hand at Motown. In a Harvard
case study about her leadership, she recounts how she dealt with covert
competition. When the employee came into her office complaining about a peer De
Passe’s response was to call that other employee into the office right away so
that she could get the whole picture in order to get to the heart of the matter.
If every leader did this it would clear the way for healthier corporate cultures. The passive aggressive employee gets the
message that subterfuge and well poisoning for advancement will not be
tolerated, and the leader gets the full story and can mediate the conflict at first
bud. Simply put this saves time, money
and is a more humane way to lead and models collaboration and teamwork.
So I ask you, where’s the love? Engendering a culture of positive regard and mutual
respect in your work force lowers attrition and keeps employees engaged,
focused and on the job.
Love is sorely absent in many of today's workplaces, that's why I'm here.
ReplyDelete